Published on Jul 24, 2026
This article was written by Adem Tumerkan
Content Editor, Dunham | 2025 ThinkAdvisor Luminary Award Winner | 2026 Wealthies Finalist — Thought Leader of the Year | Macroeconomics, markets, geopolitics & global trends
Subscribe to get the latest insights delivered straight to your inbox.
We care about your data in our privacy policy
The 30-year Treasury auction yield hit 5.058% this month1, the highest auction yield since 2007, while today’s much larger debt load is making higher long-term rates a heavier burden on the economy.
Higher long-term Treasury yields cut two ways. Bondholders get paid more, which is the upside. But borrowers and the rest of the economy tied to the 30-year rate get squeezed, from mortgage buyers to corporations refinancing debt to real estate and long-duration assets that depend on cheap money. Thus, the same yield that rewards savers also raises the cost of capital across the economy, creating a split.
The 30-year Treasury auction clearing above 5% feels like a throwback to 2007 because it is.
And while that’s a problem, the real issue is that America isn’t carrying a 2007 balance sheet anymore. It’s carrying something much heavier.
To put this into perspective, the national debt is roughly 4.4x larger2 in dollar terms than it was in 2007 (from about $9 trillion then to nearly $40 trillion today). And relative to the size of the economy, the debt burden has roughly doubled (total public debt was about 63% of GDP in Q4 2007. In Q1 2026, it was 123% of GDP)
That’s the debt gravity problem.
When debt’s relatively low, higher rates can still be a burden. But when debt’s this massive, higher rates start pulling everything around them down.
They weigh on the federal budget, mortgage rates, corporate borrowing, and stock market valuations – basically anything priced off the long end of the Treasury curve.
Think of it like carrying a backpack uphill.
In 2007, the U.S. had a heavy pack but it was manageable – but today it’s a pack filled with bricks and each step feels increasingly more burdensome as you gas out.
So yes, the 30-year yield’s been here before.
But the underlying debt that’s priced in these yields hasn’t.
The pressure is coming from three places:
Now, of course, the U.S. can still borrow. That’s not the issue.
The issue is the yield.
Every higher coupon turns yesterday’s deficit into tomorrow’s interest bill. And that interest bill becomes another reason to borrow, because more debt is needed to repay old debt.
It’s a nasty loop.
Debt creates supply. Supply demands yield. Yield raises interest costs. Interest costs create more debt. And on and on.
It also fuels inflation and widens inequality3 in the economy at a time when it’s politically polarizing.
Income goes to bondholders (usually the rich). Cash leaves borrowers through higher mortgages, higher refinancing costs, and higher taxes to pay for all this. Less room is left for households, businesses, and the federal budget.
That’s the tradeoff with higher yields - savers and bondholders get paid. Borrowers pay.
The point is - 5% long rates aren’t the shock. The shock is 5% long rates on a debt pile this large.
And all else equal, it’s only going to get worse.
China’s rare-earth magnet exports to the U.S. averaged 479 tons per month in the first half of 20264, about 20% below the 586-ton monthly average from 2022 to 2024, even though last year’s U.S.-China trade truce was supposed to keep critical materials flowing.
Rare-earth magnets are tiny parts with massive industrial leverage. They’re needed in EVs, missiles, wind turbines, drones, factory robots, MRI machines, and other critical systems. So when China keeps shipments tight, it threatens to slow key parts of U.S. manufacturing, defense, and clean energy sectors.
In October 2025, the U.S. and China reached a truce. Beijing agreed to pause sweeping export controls on rare earths, and Washington backed off tariff pressure.
Supply chains got a reprieve - but the data shows the pressure hasn’t gone away.
For example, China’s exports of rare-earth magnets to the U.S. averaged 479 tons per month in the first half of 2026, about 20% below the 586-ton average from 2022 through 2024.
That puts shipments on pace for the lowest annual monthly average since 2021.
As I’ve written before5, rare-earth magnets are niche but essential. They’re used in electric vehicles, missiles, wind turbines, drones, factory robots, MRI machines, and plenty more.
Without them, key parts of the modern economy slow down fast (if oil powered the 20th century, then rare-earth magnets help decide who controls the 21st).
And China still holds the upper hand with roughly 90% of global rare-earth processing and refining, and about 90% to 93% of permanent magnet manufacturing coming from them.
I’d call this The Damocles Supply Chain.
In the old Greek fable - The Sword of Damocles6 - Damocles sits at a feast with a sword hanging over his head by a single strand of horsehair. The food’s delicious. The chair’s comfy. But he can’t enjoy any of it because the threat is constantly above him.
And he knows the thread could snap at any moment.
That’s the U.S. rare-earth problem.
Factories can keep running. Defense contractors can keep building. Automakers can keep planning. But the key input sits under a supply chain China controls.
And Beijing doesn’t have to drop the sword.
It only has to tug the thread.
That’s what the anemic import data is really about.
The truce was supposed to keep rare-earth magnets flowing. Yet shipments to the U.S. are still significantly below the pre-curb average (with some white house officials saying China isn’t living up to its end of the deal).
Now the U.S. is racing to buy time. Trump’s latest executive order7 pushes the Pentagon to examine defense supply chains and reduce reliance on critical inputs (like magnets) from China and other rivals.
That’s why the U.S. is aggressively building mines, processing plants, allied supply deals, and domestic magnet production before the next potential squeeze comes.
Sure, maybe the truce gets renewed for another year in October 2026. Maybe it doesn’t.
But either way - the sword dangles.
CLO equity tranches returned -15% in Q1 20268, their worst quarter since the pandemic crash, as software loan prices fell, new loan supply slowed, and the gap narrowed between what CLOs earn on loans and what they owe bondholders.
CLOs are a major funding machine for corporate America. And when the riskiest part of that machine starts losing money, it can point to stress building in credit markets. The safer pieces are still getting paid, but the pain at the bottom tells us the leftover cash is shrinking. As we’ve learned throughout history, credit problems usually start at the weakest layer before they move higher.
What is a CLO, and why should anyone care?
Well, a CLO is a collateralized loan obligtion9.
That sounds complicated because Wall Street loves its alphabet soup. Terms like CDOs, ABS, MBS, CLOs. They all have different acronyms, but carry the same basic idea - take a pile of debt, slice it into pieces, grade it from best to worst, and sell them to investors.
A CLO does this with corporate loans.
Think of it like a dinner line. The CLO owns a pool of loans made to companies (often companies with weaker balance sheets). Those loans pay interest, and that cash gets served out in order.
The priority investors are at the front of the line. The middle layers come next. And the equity investors are last.
When there’s plenty of food, being last can still be great because you get the extra and don’t have to pay top dollar. But when the table runs short, that last group gets cut off first.
That’s why the latest data is so troubling.
CLO equity returned -15% in Q1 2026 (meaning those last in line saw -15% losses).
To emphasize this - that was the worst quarter since the 2020 pandemic crash, the second quarterly loss in a row, and worse than the -12% drop during the Q2 2022 bear market.
So - what’s driving such brutal losses?
Well - it’s simple. There’s less left over.
CLOs only work when the loans inside the structure keep paying well and the cost of funding the structure stays low enough. The gap between the two is the profit pool.
But that pool is draining.
Thus, the riskiest corner of corporate credit is losing money while funding costs remain high, loan prices are under pressure, and weaker borrowers struggle.
On the flip side, senior CLO investors are still getting paid - so this isn’t a market-wide crisis.
But it does show some meaningful stress in the most marginal areas of the credit market.
First, dividends may get cut. Then funds start fighting over blame. Then investors who thought they bought steady income realize how much risk they were actually carrying.
Worse is that these things can unwind fast – because when markets reprice risk, it can be like a rubber band snap.
The point is - CLO equity tranches can be the canary in the credit mine. And right now, it’s saying the easy money in credit is drying up.
This communication is general in nature and provided for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be considered or relied upon as legal, tax or investment advice or an investment recommendation, or as a substitute for legal or tax counsel. Any investment products or services named herein are for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered an offer to buy or sell, or an investment recommendation for, any specific security, strategy or investment product or service. Always consult a qualified professional or your own independent financial professional for personalized advice or investment recommendations tailored to your specific goals, individual situation, and risk tolerance. All examples are hypothetical and are for illustrative purposes only.
Information contained in the materials included is believed to be from reliable sources, but no representations or guarantees are made as to the accuracy or completeness of information. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice.
Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc. is a Registered Investment Adviser and Broker/Dealer. Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services and securities offered through Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc.
