Content Editor, Dunham | 2025 ThinkAdvisor Luminary Award Winner | 2026 Wealthies Finalist — Thought Leader of the Year | Macroeconomics, markets, geopolitics & global trends
Listen to this blog here
11:15
The Zero Line: The Spread That Forces the Fed's Hand
The gap between the U.S. unemployment rate and headline CPI has narrowed to just 0.1 percentage points — the tightest reading since the 2021–22 inflation surge.
Every time this gap has gone negative, the Fed has either hiked aggressively or paid a steep price for waiting.
What you need to know:
The U.S. unemployment rate and headline CPI are now separated by just 0.1 percentage points - with inflation at 4.2%1 and unemployment at 4.3%2 - and when this gap has closed before, the Fed usually hikes.
Why it matters:
When inflation and unemployment trade places - meaning inflation runs higher than unemployment - the Fed has historically been forced into aggressive rate hikes. The last time it happened - between 2021 and 2022 - the Fed waited nearly a year before acting. That delay eventually led to 500 basis points in hikes over 16 months (one of the sharpest tightening cycles ever).
The Deep Dive:
Are rate hikes back on the menu? They actually might be.
The Fed has two mandates: keep prices stable and keep unemployment low.
But here's the problem - those two goals can often work against each other, thereby forcing the Fed to choose its preferred poison.
Hike rates to fight inflation and risk pushing unemployment higher? Or cut rates to protect jobs and let inflation run hot.
A good way to look at this is by looking at what I call The Zero Line.
This is the spread between those two numbers - unemployment rate minus headline CPI.
When unemployment is higher than inflation (positive spread), the Fed has breathing room and can cut.
But when inflation flips unemployment (negative spread) - the Fed almost always has to hike.
1973–75: Years of "guns and butter" spending and Nixon's break from the gold standard3 had inflation running much hotter than the labor market. This forced the Fed to start hiking from ~4.5% to ~12% - then panic-cut when recession hit and unemployment soared.
1978–81: The wounds of the mid 70s inflation wave4 never healed as the Fed moved too slowly. Finally, under Paul Volcker – the Fed hiked rates to ~19% to break inflation’s back.
1999–2000: In this case, the Fed moved before the spread went too deep and hiked before inflation got out of control. This relatively preemptive and controlled hike was the closest thing to a clean outcome the record offers.
2021–22: After the massive government spending and Fed easing via COVID, inflation was primed to burst higher. But the Fed called it “transitory” and waited. This came back to bite them as they needed more than 500 basis points in hikes over 16 months - the fastest tightening cycle since Volcker.
Now here's where we are in 2026.
The Zero Line is 0.1% away from being negative as inflation comes back into the picture.
Thus, if inflation ticks above 4.3% or the unemployment rate dips, the Fed won't be choosing whether to act.
It'll be choosing how much inflationary damage it's willing to absorb until it may be forced to hike.
Let’s see if oil prices and AI spending can drop enough for inflation to cool or if the labor market starts sinking agian.
Because either one of those is needed to keep cuts going.
Figure 1: St. Louis Federal Reserve, Dunham, June 2026
The Labor Market Data No One Is Looking At (And It’s Bad)
6.2 million Americans are not in the labor force but say they want a job — above 2008 Financial Crisis levels and rising for four straight months.
The official 4.3% unemployment rate doesn't count them. Which means the labor market is softer than it looks.
What you need to know:
The number of Americans not in the labor force yet want a job just hit 6.2 million in May 2026 - up 349,000 over the last four months and now above levels seen during the early 2008 Financial Crisis
Why this matters:
These 6.2 million people don't show up in the official unemployment rate (because of how the data is counted) since they've stopped actively searching. But they're not gone. They're just sitting around waiting. And when that pool keeps growing, it tells you the job market has more slack in it than the headline number admits.
The Deep Dive:
The 4.3% unemployment rate is what you see everywhere - like on Bloomberg, the Fed statements, etc.
But it has a flaw most people often miss.
It only counts people actively looking for work.
The moment someone stops submitting applications - out of frustration, discouragement, or just checking out - they disappear from the number entirely.
As of May 2026, 6.2 million Americans (up 76k MoM) have done exactly that — and none of them show up in the headline rate.
Think of it like a car that's been gradually speeding up for three years, briefly tapped the brakes, then floored it again. The average speed looks manageable, but the acceleration is picking up and will drag that average higher.
Sure, there's always some slack in the labor market. But the scale here is what matters.
For instance, as a percentage of total employment, the NILF-WJ rate now sits at nearly 4% - already surpassing the 2001 recession peak of 3.7%.
Keep in mind that the 2008 Financial Crisis peaked at roughly 5%. So we aren’t there yet. But the trend is growing - up 1.2 million since March 2023 and rising for four straight months.
It’s that last part that’s most alarming.
Because the pace has re-accelerated to +87,000 per month. For context, the average rate during the entire 2008 Financial Crisis was +55,000 per month. Thus, the current pace is running at roughly 1.6x that.
So why are they on the sidelines?
The job market is frozen. Hiring has slowed to a crawl. Job openings have dropped sharply since 2022, meaning more applicants are chasing fewer spots.
Federal layoffs flooded the market. Federal employment has dropped by nearly ~350,000 since its 2024 peak, mostly from DOGE cuts. Those workers are now competing for state, local, and private-sector jobs - making an already tight funnel even tighter.
AI is closing doors faster than new ones open. Amazon, Block, and others have cited AI-driven productivity gains as cover for layoffs6. The high paying roles being cut - like analysis, coding, mid-level management - are exactly the ones these discouraged workers are qualified for.
Older workers can't find their way back. Workers aged 45–54 who lose jobs now spend an average of 30.7 weeks unemployed - up from 27 weeks just four years ago. For workers 55 and older, it's worse.
The point is - The data has a blind spot. And it's 6.2 million people (and counting) wide.
Figure 2: St. Louis Federal Reserve, Dunham, June 2026
China Is Stuck Between an Export Miracle and a Consumer Crisis
China's retail sales contracted 0.6% in May — the first decline since Covid lockdowns ended — while car purchases collapsed 16% and home prices accelerated their slide.
The export machine is booming on AI demand. The domestic consumer powering any real recovery is running on empty.
What you need to know:
China's retail sales fell -0.6% year-over-year7 in May 2026 - the first contraction8 since the country reopened from Covid lockdowns in late 2022 - while fixed-asset investment shrank 4.1% in the first five months of the year (the worst reading since 2020).
Why this matters:
China is the world's second-largest economy and the engine of global manufacturing demand. When its consumers stop spending, the ripple hits commodities, trade partners, and global growth expectations. And right now, the domestic side of China's economy is looking like a slow-motion consumer collapse similar to what Japan went through decades ago.
The Deep Dive:
China's economy looks like it’s splitting in half.
Industrial output is up 4.5%, profits have surged ~25% YoY, and exports are booming - especially chips and EVs.
But everything else looks pretty bleak.
Consumers are tapped out. Home prices keep sinking. And youth unemployment is over 16%.
Thus, China is running a two-speed economy - and both speeds are moving further apart.
I've long argued that Beijing was trying to export its way out of a domestic recession9. Sure, it could work short-term. But as we’ve seen throughout history, a weak consumer economy eventually becomes too big a problem to outrun.
The rest of the world is desperately waiting for the Chinese consumer to start spending again. But they shouldn't hold their breath.
Retail sales dropped 0.6% in May - the first year-over-year decline since Covid lockdowns ended in late 2022. Car purchases, home appliances, construction materials, and decoration goods - all plunged at double-digit rates.
As long as home prices keep sinking, China’s domestic economy will keep bleeding.
Meanwhile, private capital expenditure fell 7.1%10 in the first five months of 2026 - the worst since 2020. And manufacturing investment declined for the first time in six years.
And "What happens in China stays in China" is the wrong way to think about this.
Because when Chinese consumers and businesses stop spending, they stop buying. Thus, import demand drops. Global trade slows. And Australian iron ore, German luxury goods, U.S. farmers, and Southeast Asian manufacturers all feel the loss.
And it cuts the other way too.
As China keeps pumping out exports, it floods the world with goods - putting pressure on profits and jobs everywhere else.
That's how domestic weakness becomes a global problem.
Because of this, I expect trade wars to enter a second stage once the Iran situation subsides further. And this time, it may not just be the U.S. pushing back - the EU is increasingly vocal about trade imbalances11 with China.
Keep in mind that this could have worsened due to the 2026 oil shock. But the weak structural trend still has legs.
The point is - China has an export boom covering up a 2008-esque consumer bust.
But factories without buyers eventually run out of road. . .
Figure 3: Yahoo Finance, SEMAFOR, June 2026
Sources:
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — Consumer Price Index [bls.gov]
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — Civilian Unemployment Rate [bls.gov]
Dunham — AI Capex Records, Inflation, and Rare Earth Chokehold [dunham.com]
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis— Not in Labor Force, Want a Job Now [fred.stlouisfed.org]
Dunham — High-Paying Jobs, Markets Hope, and Defense Orders [dunham.com]
Yahoo Finance — Chinese Retail Sales Fall While Broader Economy Slows [finance.yahoo.com]
Bloomberg — China’s First Consumer Spending Drop Since Covid Imperils Growth [bloomberg.com]
Dunham — Trade Wars, China, and the Manufacturing Glut [dunham.com]
National Bureau of Statistics of China — Official Statistics Portal [stats.gov.cn]
Disclosures:
This communication is general in nature and provided for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be considered or relied upon as legal, tax or investment advice or an investment recommendation, or as a substitute for legal or tax counsel. Any investment products or services named herein are for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered an offer to buy or sell, or an investment recommendation for, any specific security, strategy or investment product or service. Always consult a qualified professional or your own independent financial professional for personalized advice or investment recommendations tailored to your specific goals, individual situation, and risk tolerance. All examples are hypothetical and are for illustrative purposes only.
Information contained in the materials included is believed to be from reliable sources, but no representations or guarantees are made as to the accuracy or completeness of information. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice.
Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc. is a Registered Investment Adviser and Broker/Dealer. Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services and securities offered through Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc.