Content Editor, Dunham | 2025 ThinkAdvisor Luminary Award Winner | 2026 Wealthies Finalist — Thought Leader of the Year | Macroeconomics, markets, geopolitics & global trends
China's rare earth monopoly isn't just a mining story. It's a processing story — and that distinction is why Beijing holds a chokehold over every EV motor, fighter jet, and wind turbine the West plans to build for the next decade.
Key Takeaways:
China controls ~90% of rare earth processing - not just mining - making it the single chokepoint for EVs, defense systems, wind turbines, and semiconductors. The ore isn't the problem. The mid-stream refinery is.
Beijing has already used rare earths as a weapon. Export restrictions in 2010 against Japan sent prices up 10x. April 2025 controls disrupted auto and aerospace supply chains within weeks.
The West can't build its way out quickly. Even with billions in Pentagon-backed investment, analysts project non-Chinese producers will cover less than 20% of demand for the most critical heavy rare earths by 2035.
China has a dual weapon: flood or freeze. It can crash prices to bankrupt Western competitors, or cut supply to starve NATO defense supply chains. Both are viable — and Beijing has used both.
This is the macro theme underneath every other macro theme. AI data centers, the energy transition, global rearmament — all of it runs on rare earths that China controls. Supply chain independence is a mid-2030s story at best.
Listen to this blog here
14:58
While the U.S.1 and the E.U.2 argue over tariffs and anti‑dumping cases against China, Beijing could be sitting on something far more powerful than any trade measure.
It controls the processing behind the building blocks of modern industry.
Every EV rolling off a German assembly line relies on Chinese‑processed neodymium magnets in its motor. Every modern fighter jet contains rare earth materials overwhelmingly refined in China. Every wind turbine Europe's counting on to hit its climate goals needs dysprosium and terbium that almost certainly passed through a Chinese refinery.
Global tariffs will hurt China - especially as it leans on exports to prop up its own 2008-esque slowdown. But the products driving global industry, defense, and clean energy still run on inputs only China can process at scale.
So, the West can raise tariffs as much as it likes. But Beijing can simply slow rare earth exports and watch auto plants in Germany, defense programs in the U.S., and wind projects across NATO grind to a halt.
It powers data centers, energy infrastructure, weapons systems, and EV fleets. And it can't be fixed anytime soon.
That's the chokehold.
And the most remarkable part? China built it by spending decades on an unprofitable business on purpose.
Here's everything you need to know.
What Are Rare Earth Elements — and Why China's Processing Monopoly Is the Real Problem
Rare earths are 17 metallic elements6 with names I can't even really pronounce - neodymium, dysprosium, terbium, yttrium, and a bunch of others.
And ironically, they're not even that rare in the earth's crust. The U.S., Australia, Brazil, and others all have deposits.
But the problem isn't digging them up - it's turning low‑grade ore into ultra‑pure materials that can survive inside a jet engine or an EV drivetrain.
Most of these elements behave almost identically once dissolved. Separating them takes hundreds of stages of chemical extraction - long chains of tanks, acids, and organic solvents. Heavy rare earths (like dysprosium and terbium) need even more steps. And the whole process is dirty, slow, and costly.
But the payoff is huge – for example:
Neodymium creates the strongest permanent magnets we know - the ones that spin EV motors and wind turbines. Without it, the energy transition slows.
Dysprosium lets those magnets survive high temperatures without losing strength - essential in EV drivetrains and guided weapons.
Yttrium coats jet engine blades so they don’t fail at extreme heat.
Gadolinium makes MRI machines work.
And for the foreseeable future, there aren’t any realistic substitutes.
To highlight this, McKinsey7 projects a shortfall of up to 30% in magnetic rare earth supply globally by 2035 – meaning that demand is compounding faster than supply by a significant amount.
The point is, these rare earths and their processing are absolutely critical to the modern age.
And one country completely dominates this.
How China Built a 30-Year Rare Earth Monopoly No One Can Copy
Warren Buffett loves companies with "moats"8 - built‑in advantages that make it very hard for anyone else to compete, like a deep moat around a castle.
In rare earths, China didn't just build a moat. It dug one around the entire 21st century.
And the moat isn't in the ore. It's in the mid-stream processing.
China mines about 60% of the world's rare earth ore. That stat gets the headlines. It's not the most important number.
The rest of the world can mine the other 40% of ore - but most of that rock still has to go to China to be turned into something you can bolt into an EV, a radar, or a turbine.
That's the real moat.
How did this all start?
Well – back in the late 1970s and early 1990s - Deng Xiaoping10 (often called the "architect of modern China) was already thinking about strategic leverage.
After Mao's death, Deng gradually displaced Mao's chosen successor (Hua Guofeng) and steered China from a rigid Marxist economy toward a "socialist market economy" - still under Communist Party control, but using markets and private enterprise to drive growth.
During a visit to Baotou, China's main rare earth hub in Inner Mongolia, Deng is widely reported to have said: "The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths."
From there, Beijing opened the taps. Governments used subsidies, tax breaks, cheap loans, and light environmental rules to build the industry. Plants ran even when profits were negative. Pollution that would've shut a Western refinery down got tolerated. Over time, China consolidated small producers into large, state‑linked groups with national quotas, export rules, and technology controls locked around them.
That's how you go from "we have ore" to "we own the chokepoint."
Decades of trial and error now show up as lower costs, higher yields, and people who know how to fix problems on the plant floor in real time.
Economists call this the learning curve.
Every time total output doubles, costs tend to fall. Thus, volume + time = growth. And China has had both in rare earth processing for more than 30 years.
It also built the brain trust.
China now supports dozens of rare‑earth labs and at least 11 universities and technical colleges that together enroll hundreds of students a year into rare‑earth programs - a deep pipeline of chemists, engineers, and miners.
Figure 1: Reuters, May 2026
By contrast, U.S. universities awarded just over 200 general mining and metallurgical engineering bachelor’s degrees in 2023 - across all commodities (not just rare earths).
MeaningChina didn’t just build the processing infrastructure. It made sure no one else ever learned how.
That’s their moat. The ore, people, and technology.
And it’s thirty years deep.
China's Rare Earth Export Controls: The Trade War Weapon Already in Use
China has a track record of using rare earths as a bargaining chip.
Back in 2010, after a minor clash between a Chinese fishing boat and the Japanese coast guard12 near disputed islands, Beijing curbed rare earth exports to Japan, which depended on China for roughly 80% of its supply. No formal embargo - just export licenses that never got approved. Within a year, prices for several key rare earths had jumped by as much as 10x.
Fast‑forward to April 2025. After Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs, Beijing responded with export controls on seven key rare earths13. Within weeks, auto and aerospace plants in the U.S., Europe, and Japan were flagging supply problems as approvals slowed or stopped.
By October 2025, China went further14. Any product - made anywhere in the world - containing even a trace of Chinese rare earth material needed Beijing's approval to ship. That means a motor built in Germany using a magnet sourced through a Chinese supplier could be held up by a bureaucrat in Beijing.
China paused that second wave of controls later in 2025 amid global pressure. But only until late 2026.
China's Dual Weapon: Flood or Freeze
Now the world lives at China's mercy in two directions:
Flood: Beijing can dump cheap rare earths into the market, drive prices below Western production costs, and strand billion‑dollar projects before they ever break even (they're big enough to survive low prices for a long time).
Freeze: Beijing can tighten or pause exports, starving supply chains that depend on Chinese refining and forcing everyone from EV makers to missile programs into rationing mode (also fattening up their profits).
Either way - flood or freeze - rare earths let China move markets and policy without firing a shot.
Can the West Break China's Rare Earth Dominance? It's Tough
Now, keep in mind that the West isn’t sitting still. It’s trying to get out from under Beijing’s thumb.
But the real question is whether it’s moving fast enough - and in the right way.
The U.S., Australia, Japan, and Europe15 have pledged billions to build non‑Chinese mines, refineries, and magnet plants. The Pentagon's taking equity stakes and locking in long‑term supply deals.
And while that’s nice – it requires so much more.
For example, estimates16 show roughly 4% of U.S. GDP - about $1.2 trillion - comes from industries directly exposed to rare‑earth inputs.
That's the size of the Achilles heel everyone's trying to armor.
So while these nations have their differences - they’re all coming together to try and break China’s rare earth grip.
But the projections are worrying.
Even with all this investment, by 2035, producers outside China are likely to meet less than 20% of global demand for dysprosium and terbium - the heavy elements critical for high‑performance magnets and defense tech (and this doesn’t even factor in the amount the U.S. will need to rearm its missiles after the Iran-war bled through its stockpiles).
Figure 2: Reuters, November 2025
Thus, rare earths are more of a 2030-40 theme rather than 2020.
Because we’re just in the first inning of this game.
There's also Project Vault17 - Trump's push for a public‑private stockpile of U.S. critical metals. But stockpiling ore or partially processed material doesn't fix the underlying problem.
Ore sitting in a vault is just that - expensive dirt collecting dust.
The bottleneck's in the mid‑stream - the refining and processing China dominates. Even where the West's building mine‑to‑refinery chains - Lynas in Australia, pilot plants in the U.S. and Brazil - the output is microscopic versus demand.
Then there’s pricing power.
The Pentagon’s deal with MP Materials looks aggressive on paper with its equity stake and10‑year price floor (aka the government is backing the price of the metals) - but the reference price that triggers those subsidies are still based on Chinese neodymium‑praseodymium (NdPr) benchmarks.
Figure 3: Reuters, February 2026
Said another way - the U.S. has a domestic producer now, yet Beijing’s market still defines what “cheap” and “expensive” mean for that contract.
It could also make it extremely costly for the government (aka taxpayers) to subsidize miners and processors if they put in a price floor and spot prices fall below it (distorting supply and demand of these metals).
The NdPr chart from Shanghai Metals Market has shown how wild those Chinese prices can be.
When they spike, China can ease restrictions and present itself as the “stabilizer.”
Figure 4: TradingEconomics, June 2026
Some Western exchanges are trying to change that.
Benchmark Mineral Intelligence is collecting non‑China rare‑earth prices to build its own market - while CME and ICE are studying rare‑earth futures contracts - taking a page from lithium, where CME futures have started to give Western producers and buyers a pricing venue that isn’t entirely anchored on Chinese exchanges.
The only issue is that such architecture is still early.
The point is, until there’s real non‑Chinese processing volume and real non‑Chinese price discovery, the West’s dependent on China twice:
Once for the actual metal. And once for the price.
The Wheels Are in Motion — But This Is a Decade Story
The policy tools now on the table – like equity stakes, price floors, long‑term buying deals, allied funding, new training programs - look a lot like the playbook China used on its way up.
The U.S. and its partners are finally treating rare earths like the strategic infrastructure they are.
But China still has the refineries, the mines, the schools, the talent pipelines, the pricing benchmarks, and a 30‑year head start. The U.S. has one major mine, a handful of pilot plants, and some heavy‑rare‑earth output measured in kilograms.
It'll take at least a decade of continuous, expensive work18 to loosen China's grip in any meaningful way. And even then, the goal isn't really independence. It's just moving from a "fatal chokehold" to a "concentrated risk but survivable."
The West can't stockpile its way out of this. It must build a parallel and integrated system - processing, people, know‑how, pricing - and keep building it even when prices crash (which they most likely will as China tries to flood out competitors).
That's the real macro theme for the next decade.
Not just that China has a rare‑earth mining monopoly.
But that it has a processing monopoly, a talent monopoly, and a pricing monopoly - and breaking any one of those without the other two won't be enough.
Frequently Asked Questions About China's Rare Earth Strategy
What did Deng Xiaoping mean by "the Middle East has oil, China has rare earths"? In the late 1980s, Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping said this line to signal that Beijing saw rare earth deposits as a strategic asset on par with oil. That framing shaped three decades of state subsidies, tax breaks, and industrial policy that built China's current processing monopoly.
What is China's "flood or freeze" rare earth strategy? China can use rare earths two ways: flood the market with cheap supply to bankrupt Western competitors before they turn a profit, or freeze exports to starve supply chains that depend on Chinese refining. Beijing has used both tactics, giving it leverage over prices and production timelines alike.
How many rare earth engineers does the U.S. train compared to China? U.S. universities awarded just over 200 general mining and metallurgical engineering degrees in 2023, across all commodities combined. China supports at least 11 universities and technical colleges enrolling hundreds of students a year into rare-earth-specific programs alone, giving it a much deeper long-term talent pipeline.
Why doesn't a price floor like MP Materials' fix America's rare earth problem? The Pentagon's price floor for MP Materials guarantees a minimum price for U.S.-produced neodymium and praseodymium. But the benchmark price that triggers the subsidy is still tied to Chinese pricing data. That means Beijing's market still effectively sets what counts as "cheap" or "expensive," even for a domestic U.S. producer.
Sources:
Dunham & Associates — U.S. Trump Tariff Policy Trade War [dunham.com]
Dunham & Associates — China EU Trade War Economic Impact [dunham.com]
Dunham & Associates — AI CapEx Records Inflation Rare Earth Chokehold [dunham.com]
Andersen Institute — China’s Export Control Architecture and Its Use of Critical Minerals as Strategic Pressure Points [anderseninstitute.org]
S&P Global — Rare Earth Supply Bottlenecks Set to Persist in 2026 [spglobal.com]
Sprott — Why the World Is Racing to Secure Rare Earths [sprott.com]
Bloomberg — Pentagon Aims to Break China Rare Earths Grip With Critical Minerals Plan [bloomberg.com]
Center for Strategic and International Studies — Project Vault: Pillar of Economic Security [csis.org]
William Blair — The Multi-Billion Dollar Price Tag of U.S. Rare Earth Independence [williamblair.com]
Disclosures
This communication is general in nature and provided for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be considered or relied upon as legal, tax or investment advice or an investment recommendation, or as a substitute for legal or tax counsel. Any investment products or services named herein are for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered an offer to buy or sell, or an investment recommendation for, any specific security, strategy or investment product or service. Always consult a qualified professional or your own independent financial professional for personalized advice or investment recommendations tailored to your specific goals, individual situation, and risk tolerance. All examples are hypothetical and are for illustrative purposes only.
Information contained in the materials included is believed to be from reliable sources, but no representations or guarantees are made as to the accuracy or completeness of information. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice.
Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc. is a Registered Investment Adviser and Broker/Dealer. Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services and securities offered through Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc.
