Published on Jun 11, 2026 • Updated on Jun 14, 2026
This article was written by Salvatore M. Capizzi
Salvatore M. Capizzi, CEPA, CBDA, is Dunham's Chief of Sales & Marketing and a 2026 Wealthies CMO of the Year Finalist. His work focuses on retirement planning, emerging trends for financial advisors, and advanced tax, trust, and estate strategies.
Subscribe to get the latest insights delivered straight to your inbox.
We care about your data in our privacy policy
Here's the paradox.
Sailing at full speed - sails wide open - mirrors a growth-heavy investment strategy. More exposure to equities means more potential for the long haul, but it also means more exposure to those early storms.
But sailing too cautiously - reduced canvas, slow pace - mirrors a conservative strategy. It protects against storms, but you may run out of supplies before you ever reach Hawaii.
Neither extreme works. The captain - like the advisor - has to manage both risks at once.
Historically, equities have been the primary tool for fighting inflation and funding longer retirements.
From December 1984 through December 2024, the S&P 500 delivered an annualized return of 11.76%, including reinvested dividends. Over the same period, average annual inflation ran at 2.79% - leaving a real, inflation-adjusted return of 8.97%.
To put that in perspective: a $100,000 investment in December 1984 would have grown to approximately $8,539,958 by December 2024. Simply keeping pace with inflation would have required only $300,632.
That 40-year window included five bear markets, the second-worst market decline in S&P 500 history, and the "lost decade" for stocks. Equities absorbed all of it and still delivered.
The Paradox: The same equities that fight inflation and fund longevity are the ones that introduce sequence risk — the possibility of devastating early losses that can permanently derail retirement.
Advisors can reduce sequence risk with lower-volatility tools: annuities, bond ladders, bucket strategies, and risk-managed allocations. These approaches protect portfolios from early drawdown damage.
The Paradox: The same tools that defend against sequence risk often can't generate enough growth to keep pace with inflation or fund a retirement that runs 40 years or more.
This is the core of the Retirement Investment Paradox™. The assets best suited for long-term growth carry the most short-term risk. The strategies that reduce short-term risk often can't deliver the long-term growth retirees actually need.
Consider this scenario. A retiree starts with $1 million and earns a net 4% annual return after all fees and expenses. They withdraw $40,000 per year, increasing that amount by 2% annually to account for inflation.
Despite steady, positive returns - the portfolio runs dry by year 34
Now push the return to 5% net. Better — but the portfolio still exhausts itself by year 43.
For a 65-year-old who lives to 105, even a 5% net return may not be enough.
The point is this, what used to be considered a conservative, responsible return may no longer be sufficient for the retirements advisors are actually building today.
The Retirement Investment Paradox™ is not a theoretical problem. It plays out in real portfolios, with real clients, every day.
Traditional portfolio theory was built for shorter retirements. The old 60/40 rule, conventional safe withdrawal rates, and standard compliance frameworks weren't designed for a 40-year funding horizon with compounding inflation baked in.
Now, they may need to be rethought.
Advisors who recognize the paradox early - and build strategies that solve for both longevity and protection simultaneously - will be better positioned to serve clients navigating one of the most complex planning environments in modern history.
The Retirement Investment Paradox™ is the tension between needing portfolio growth to fund longer retirements and needing protection against early losses. The assets that best provide long-term growth tend to carry the most short-term risk — and the strategies that reduce that risk often can't deliver the growth retirees need.
Losses in the early years of retirement — while a retiree is actively making withdrawals — can permanently reduce portfolio longevity. Even strong returns later may not be enough to recover what was lost when the balance was at its highest.
Not necessarily. A 4% net annual return after fees and expenses may still deplete a $1 million portfolio within 34 years once inflation-adjusted withdrawals are factored in — well short of a 40-year retirement.
Equities have historically outpaced inflation over long periods, but they also expose retirees to sequence risk — the possibility that early market losses, combined with ongoing withdrawals, permanently impair the portfolio.
Advisors can consider blending growth assets with lower-volatility holdings — such as annuities, bond ladders, or bucket strategies — and building portfolios specifically designed to manage both longevity and downside risk at the same time.
This communication is general in nature and provided for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be considered or relied upon as legal, tax or investment advice or an investment recommendation. Any investment products or services named herein are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be considered an offer to buy or sell, or an investment recommendation for, any specific security, strategy or investment product or service. Always consult a qualified professional or your own independent financial professional for personalized advice or investment recommendations tailored to your specific goals, individual situation, and risk tolerance.
Information contained in the materials included is believed to be from reliable sources, but no representations or guarantees are made as to the accuracy or completeness of information. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice.
Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc. is a Registered Investment Adviser and Broker/Dealer. Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services and securities offered through Dunham & Associates Investment Counsel, Inc.
